Need for further water, sanitation and hygiene programmes among people living with HIV

The impact of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions on the health and well-being of people living with HIV: a systematic review.

Yates T, Lantagne D, Mintz E, Quick R. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015 Apr 15;68 Suppl 3:S318-30. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000487.

Background: Access to improved water supply and sanitation is poor in low-income and middle-income countries. Persons living with HIV/AIDS (PLHIV) experience more severe diarrhea, hospitalizations, and deaths from diarrhea because of waterborne pathogens than immunocompetent populations, even when on antiretroviral therapy (ART).

Methods: We examined the existing literature on the impact of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions on PLHIV for these outcomes: (1) mortality, (2) morbidity, (3) retention in HIV care, (4) quality of life, and (5) prevention of ongoing HIV transmission. Cost-effectiveness was also assessed. Relevant abstracts and articles were gathered, reviewed, and prioritized by thematic outcomes of interest. Articles meeting inclusion criteria were summarized in a grid for comparison.

Results: We reviewed 3355 citations, evaluated 132 abstracts, and read 33 articles. The majority of the 16 included articles focused on morbidity, with less emphasis on mortality. Contaminated water, lack of sanitation, and poor hygienic practices in homes of PLHIV increase the risk of diarrhea, which can result in increased viral load, decreased CD4 counts, and reduced absorption of nutrients and antiretroviral medication. We found WASH programming, particularly water supply, household water treatment, and hygiene interventions, reduced morbidity. Data were inconclusive on mortality. Research gaps remain in retention in care, quality of life, and prevention of ongoing HIV transmission. Compared with the standard threshold of 3 times GDP per capita, WASH interventions were cost-effective, particularly when incorporated into complementary programs.

Conclusions: Although research is required to address behavioral aspects, evidence supports that WASH programming is beneficial for PLHIV.

Abstract access  [1]

Editor’s notes: Researchers, implementers, and policy makers have been examining how to better integrate programmes with overlapping burdens of morbidity and mortality. This paper illustrates how access to clean water and good sanitation practices, or lack thereof, can impact the health of people living with HIV. Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) programmes can improve the negative effects poor water quality and bad sanitation have on people living with HIV. They reduce or even eliminate diarrheal infections, which allow for better absorption of HIV treatment medication that leads to a reduction in viral load and increased CD4 counts. While this systematic review revealed evidence on the reduced burden of morbidity that WASH programmes can confer, little has been done in the way of research linking WASH programmes to mortality in people living with HIV, nor how they may affect adherence or retention in care. Side effects of HIV treatment is a common reason why people stop taking medications, and common side effects are nausea and diarrhoea. It is possible that intestinal issues caused by unsafe drinking water could exacerbate the impact of side effects on people already experiencing them, therefore reducing motivation to continue taking their ARVs. This paper also suggests that synergies in cost sharing and increasing cost effectiveness could be achieved by integrating programmes. However further research is necessary to fully understand the logistical and cost implications.


Africa [9], Asia [10]
Botswana [11], Cameroon [12], Côte d'Ivoire [13], Ethiopia [14], Guyana [15], Haiti [16], India [17], Kenya [18], Mozambique [19], Nigeria [20], Rwanda [21], South Africa [22], Uganda [23], United Republic of Tanzania [24], Zimbabwe [25]
  • [26]