Comparing strategies for HIV testing and counselling for children and adolescents

Uptake and yield of HIV testing and counselling among children and adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Govindasamy D, Ferrand RA, Wilmore SM, Ford N, Ahmed S, Afnan-Holmes H, Kranzer K. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015 Oct 14;18(1):20182. doi: 10.7448/IAS.18.1.20182. eCollection 2015.

Introduction: In recent years children and adolescents have emerged as a priority for HIV prevention and care services. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the acceptability, yield and prevalence of HIV testing and counselling (HTC) strategies in children and adolescents (5 to 19 years) in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods: An electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health and conference abstract databases. Studies reporting on HTC acceptability, yield and prevalence and published between January 2004 and September 2014 were included. Pooled proportions for these three outcomes were estimated using a random effects model. A quality assessment was conducted on included studies.

Results and discussion: A total of 16 380 potential citations were identified, of which 21 studies (23 entries) were included. Most studies were conducted in Kenya (n=5) and Uganda (n=5) and judged to provide moderate (n=15) to low quality (n=7) evidence, with data not disaggregated by age. Seven studies reported on provider-initiated testing and counselling (PITC), with the remainder reporting on family-centred (n=5), home-based (n=5), outreach (n=5) and school-linked HTC among primary schoolchildren (n=1). PITC among inpatients had the highest acceptability (86.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.5 to 100%), yield (12.2%; 95% CI: 6.1 to 18.3%) and prevalence (15.4%; 95% CI: 5.0 to 25.7%). Family-centred HTC had lower acceptance compared to home-based HTC (51.7%; 95% CI: 10.4 to 92.9% vs. 84.9%; 95% CI: 74.4 to 95.4%) yet higher prevalence (8.4%; 95% CI: 3.4 to 13.5% vs. 3.0%; 95% CI: 1.0 to 4.9%). School-linked HTC showed poor acceptance and low prevalence.

Conclusions: While PITC may have high test acceptability priority should be given to evaluating strategies beyond healthcare settings (e.g. home-based HTC among families) to identify individuals earlier in their disease progression. Data on linkage to care and cost-effectiveness of HTC strategies are needed to strengthen policies.

Abstract [1]  Full-text [free] access [2]

Editor’s notes: In sub-Saharan Africa children and adolescents are a priority group for HIV prevention and care services. Children and adolescents living with HIV are less likely than adults to know their HIV status, to access treatment and to achieve virologic suppression. As with adults, the first essential step to managing HIV in children and adolescents is to provide appropriate HIV testing and counselling services. This is the first systematic review to assess HIV testing and counselling strategies in this age group, 5-19 years. One key finding is the lack of data on testing and counselling services for this age group. Most services replicate strategies developed for adults with little consideration for the specific needs of children and adolescents. The studies illustrated that health care facility-based provider-initiated testing and counselling had relatively high acceptance, yield and linkage-to-care, but tended to identify individuals at a late stage of disease. In contrast, community-based approaches had the potential to diagnose asymptomatic children. Further work on innovative approaches, family-centred and mobile-based, should be assessed.  

HIV testing [5]
Africa [6]
Kenya [7], Malawi [8], South Africa [9], Sudan [10], Uganda [11], United Republic of Tanzania [12], Zambia [13], Zimbabwe [14]
  • [15]